Run internet explorer 7 on windows 2000 pro

Try 1 month free. Was this information helpful? Yes No. Thank you! Any more feedback? The more you tell us the more we can help. Can you help us improve? Resolved my issue. Clear instructions. Easy to follow. No jargon. Pictures helped. Didn't match my screen. Incorrect instructions. Too technical. Not enough information. Not enough pictures. Any additional feedback? Best Apple iPad deals available right now: January You agree to receive updates, promotions, and alerts from ZDNet.

You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to receive the selected newsletter s which you may unsubscribe from at any time. You also agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge the data collection and usage practices outlined in our Privacy Policy.

What are you looking for? Preferences Community Newsletters Log Out. Written by Jo Best , Contributor. Full Bio. And no early-bird Outlook for anyone The next version of the Internet Explorer browser will be available to a variety of Microsoft OSes, the product team has revealed - but Windows looks likely to be absent from the list.

However, I really like it. Especially Internet Explorer 8. It has a great user interface. In my obnoxious opinion, Internet Explorer 8 looks exactly like a web browser should. With all due respect: The only reason unofficial updates exist is because someone decided to create them or, more usually, port updates intended for other platforms to one that's now unsupported because the software house which created the -- now unsupported -- platform decided fully within its rights to stop supporting it, usually after having done so viz.

That said, the reason support is dropped is because it's expensive and time-consuming to test -- exaustively enough for release -- every single update that proves to become necessary.

So, by their own intrinsic nature, unofficial updates are much less well tested, and, of course, can give problems. In fact, such preventive measures should ideally be taken even for the case of official updates, actually, although most users never even think about that.

Else one ought to take the blue pill , instead, and let unofficial stuff well alone. When it comes to the newer updates, created by several different people, there simply doesn't exist a large user base for Windows any more to test such unofficial releases thoroughly enough. In case of the unofficial updates released by myself, I'd say the only semi -stable one is UURollup-v10d.

At this point it's rather old and doesn't contain any new files with updated functions, but has been installed and tested in various environments without causing any major issues. Despite all that, there still exist some bugs in it, some of which were reported long after the original package had been released. All in all, I think it's simply impossible to do proper testing of unofficial updates for Windows If you decide to use them you should always be aware of possible consequences.

Doing a full system backup beforehand is always recommended. You need to be a member in order to leave a comment. Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy! Already have an account? Sign in here.

MSFN is made available via donations, subscriptions and advertising revenue. The use of ad-blocking software hurts the site. Please disable ad-blocking software or set an exception for MSFN. Share More sharing options Followers 0. Prev 1 2 Next Page 1 of 2. Recommended Posts. MrMaguire Posted May 23, Posted May 23, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options Maybe this? I don't know since I haven't tried it yet the KernelEX